Sponsors & CROs
Site feasibility
Before you finalize a site list, see which participating sites have patients likely to qualify for your protocol, how many, and which other studies are recruiting them.
Created by
The product
Pick sites that can
actually enroll.
Four things this use case does to replace questionnaire guesswork with evidence when you select sites for a new trial.
Your protocol, tested across sites
Run draft eligibility criteria against participating sites and see which criteria shrink the eligible pool most — before the protocol is locked
Eligible patients by site
De-identified, aggregated counts of likely-eligible patients at each participating site, from their current records.
Competing studies in view
See where your target population is already being recruited by other trials, so you avoid sites that will struggle to enroll.
Faster feasibility, fewer surveys
Shortlist sites from data instead of chasing feasibility questionnaires, then confirm with the investigators you want.
In practice
CROs that select sites on evidence
We used to choose sites from feasibility questionnaires and hope. Now we start from real eligible-patient counts, and the sites we activate actually enroll.
Sophie K.
Feasibility Lead2×
faster site selection
Find sites that will enroll.
Before you activate them.
Bring us your next protocol and we’ll walk you through site feasibility for it. Centrova is working with a small group of early sponsor and CRO partners.
Talk to our team